Review: Gone Girl

Affleck leads a good cast in David Fincher's intelligent and entertaining murder-mystery. (20th Century Fox/aceshowbiz.com)

Affleck leads a good cast in David Fincher’s intelligent and entertaining murder-mystery. (20th Century Fox/aceshowbiz.com)

David Fincher has made some of the best movies of the last 20 or so years, and maybe some of the best of all-time. When I think ‘classics’, Fight ClubSe7en,  and the Social Network surely come to mind. And let’s not forget outstanding efforts like Zodiac and The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo, as well. So give him a crime thriller, completely character-driven, with twists and turns, and a good cast…and you’ve got yourself one hell of a film, and yet another example of why he has to be considered one of the best directors in Hollywood.

Based on the best-selling novel, a Missouri man is suddenly caught in a whirlwind of accusations from local and national media when his wife goes missing. Played by Ben Affleck, we watch Nick Dunne go from loving husband, to possible murderer, and is put through the ringer on every move he makes. His sister (and only ally) is vilified, his in-laws are sure of his guilt and more or less disown him. But all the while, we’re introduced to curious clues – ones that make us question and reevaluate what we just thought was right. Lawyers come on, ex-lovers come on, and each step makes the story murkier. When the truth is revealed, it’s not the end of the movie at all, either. The brilliance is where it goes once we know what’s going to happen.

It’s no surprise that upon reading facts about Gone Girl on IMDB, it turns out Brad Pitt was considered for the lead role. Seeing as how he’s been the main character in three David Fincher movies, it’s sort of shocking we’re given Ben Affleck instead. But Affleck did well, as did Rosamund Pike – whom I’d had never heard of prior to this film. As in so many of Fincher’s movies, the supporting cast is wildly strong as well. Carrie Coon as Affleck’s sister, Kim Dickens as the local detective, and Tyler Perry as Affleck’s lawyer. Wait…what? Yes, that Tyler Perry. If a movie can make me appreciate how good Tyler Perry was, it’s automatically a huge success. Without question though, the acting was spot-on across the board. No performance struck me as Oscar worthy, and nothing completely blew me away, but with the intricate story that’s been built around the characters, you really didn’t need anything amazing.

What was best about Gone Girl was the feel of it. David Fincher has such a unique style to his directing, and you can feel it in the dark themes and dark picture (literally). You can hear it in the music (Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, again), and see it in the editing. Each scene and every exchange has this wonderfully well established sense of doom and mystery. I can’t credit anyone but the man behind the camera himself. Once again, Fincher has shown how to take a crime drama and make it into something so very memorable. It’s a good sign when the running time of nearly two and a half hours doesn’t feel long at all. And as the credits began to roll, you’re left wanting even more of Gone Girl. I’d consider that a pretty huge success.

 

GONE GIRL: original_barnstar original_barnstar original_barnstar (out of 4)

Review: The Skeleton Twins

the-skeleton-twins02 (1)

Despite the occasional terrific scene, Hader and Wiig can’t save the film from being anything other than mediocre (Roadside Attractions/aceshowbiz.com).

In the Skeleton Twins, real life comedians Bill Hader and Kristen Wiig play siblings that are very emotionally unstable, and struggle mightily with their own issues. Having not seen in each in a decade, we’re introduced to them in what might be the worst way possible: attempted suicides. But as it would turn out, neither would end up dying, and both join together to reunite, and to try and rebuild themselves.

Whether it’s cheating on their partner multiple times, lying about trying to conceive a child, sleeping with a teacher and former child predator, an emotionally detached mother, dead father from suicide, or just extreme depression, these two, now grown-ups, have quite the laundry list of serious things to deal with. Throughout the movie, we see them go in waves: from bonding, laughing, and emotional understanding, to repeated mistakes, additional suicidal thoughts, and more. It’s heavy, and the acting is alright, but for such devastating material, I found myself somewhat bored through all of the ups and downs of the film. It felt much, much longer than its actual running time, which is also never a good thing.

I’m not entirely sure what the point of some of the scenes were, as it felt like it was just repeating itself. And granted, there were some really quality parts to this movie…but they were too few and far between. They would’ve been foolish to not have any comedic sequences with these two actors as their leads – and luckily, they didn’t waste that opportunity. But, yet again, there were just too few of those moments to hold the entire project above water for me.

THE SKELETON TWINS: original_barnstar original_barnstar (out of 4)

Review: Calvary

calvary still

When I see a movie in theaters, there has to be some pretty strong interest to get me out to the cinema. Whether it’s the actors, the story, the reviews, or a combination of these factors, I need a pretty strong pull to avoid me thinking “eh, I can wait for that on demand or on Netflix.” Calvary had so many things working in its favor that got me out to see it: Brendan Gleeson, a controversy surrounding an Irish priest, and nearly 90 percent on Rotten Tomatoes (and good word of mouth from someone I know). So, why am I sitting here, writing this somewhat disappointed?

I’m writing this slightly disappointed because there’s another large factor for a movie to succeed: it has to, or something about it, has to stay with me and make me think or impact me in some fashion after the end credits roll. I want to talk about it or think about it, and most of all, care about it. The problem with this film, was that I really didn’t care about the characters or the story or what I just saw, not even ten minutes after leaving the theater. Nothing provoked further thoughts or talks, and that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. One would think that a good lead actor taking on a story about a Catholic priest that’s threatened to be murdered would pretty much equate to instantaneous conversation. Sadly, it was not the case. 

Calvary also felt sort of disjointed, and while I was waiting for the ending, the middle (the huge majority of the film) scenes jumped around and told little stories that didn’t all come together for me. Nothing truly stood out and raised my interest level – I was just waiting for the ending sequence. It’s tough to have a great movie when a big chunk of it feels so slow. Now with that said, this wasn’t a bomb by any stretch. The acting was good, especially from our lead, Brendan Gleeson. The scenery was very nice and lent itself quite well to the ominous plot. The beginning scene had you on the edge of your seat, as did the final scene. So, yes, there were good things…but just not enough in total, and not frequently enough. 

 

CALVARY:  original_barnstar original_barnstar half_barnstar (out of 4)

Review: Guardians of the Galaxy

'Guardians' featured a great cast, fun action, and a welcome change to the predictable superhero universes. (Marvel Studios/aceshowbiz.com)

‘Guardians’ featured a great cast, fun action, and a welcome change to the predictable superhero universes. (Marvel Studios/aceshowbiz.com)

It sure seems like a long time since I’ve seen a movie in theaters. And additionally, it sure seems like a long time since I’ve seen a comic book based movie that doesn’t feel like the same…darn…thing, over and over again. The Nolan Batman trilogy aside, can you think of one that stands out as memorable, that hasn’t been tainted or watered down to an extent by sequels and reboots galore? Spiderman, Iron Man, Captain America, X-Men…they keep coming out with new ones that follow the same formula. Do they work? Sure, they’re probably fun, and harmless. But there’s no risk involved, there’s flailing originality in the Marvel and DC universes. Then came along the weirdest, brashest comic book movie I’ve ever seen to partially restore my faith in this genre: Guardians of the Galaxy.

An 80’s kid, a green-skinned warrior, a blue hulk of a destroyer, a maniac raccoon, and a tree with a below-average IQ. Those are your heroes. Those are the main characters in what Marvel hoped would not be an absolute bomb at the box office. Turns out their gamble paid off big time. The breath of fresh air from this band of misfits is so utterly enjoyable, so fun and likable, that it’s hard not to gush at what a good time it was to just sit back and take this film in. Will the story set the world on fire? Will it become an instant classic, or even become your favorite superhero movie ever? Doubtful, on both accounts. But it does so many things right, that those things don’t even seem to matter.

One thing the movie does better than most, is its’ humor. This is led by our main character, Peter Quill (aka, Starlord), played by the incredible Chris Pratt. From minor appearances in Zero Dark Thirty to Moneyball, and his starring role in NBC’s Parks and Recreation, it’s clear that Pratt is on the rise. And this role just put him over the top. He’s a normal guy superhero, with no superpowers or crazy suits and gadgets. He does possess impeccable timing for one-liners and great humor littered throughout the movie. But the laughs don’t end with just Pratt: the entire cast has brief moments of humor that make the watching experience that much more enjoyable.

Without going to the point of labeling this a comedy, it should be noted that Guardians is a hell of a ride when it comes to outerspace action, too. The effects were good (nothing incredible), and the worlds we were introduced to were grimy, realistic (despite being futuristic), and in a funny way…ordinary. That’s not to say they were like what you might see on Earth, but for some reason, they never struck me as crazy as some things in other Marvel or DC movies. Maybe it’s because I liked the characters so much, and was having so much fun watching, that I just accepted things as normal.

Even the voice actors – Vin Diesel and Bradley Cooper – were good. Diesel voiced a tree, who had, from what I remember, two different lines he used in the entire movie. And yet, it was suitable and at times, very heartfelt (trust me on this). Cooper on the other hand, was a non-stop chatterbox, who hit it out of the park as an insane, yet insecure, raccoon.

 

GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXYoriginal_barnstar original_barnstar original_barnstar (out of 4)

Review: Edge of Tomorrow

Tom Cruise delivers in an original action blockbuster (shocking these days!). (Warner Bros/aceshowbiz.com)

Tom Cruise delivers in this creative action blockbuster (shocking these days!). (Warner Bros/aceshowbiz.com)

In a summer where Transformers 5, Spiderman 2 (but really like, 5), X-Men 2 (again, 5), Planet of the Apes 2 (4? 5?), How to Train Your Dragon 2, Godzilla (so many), and countless other remakes and sequels are hitting the box office, it’s really quite difficult to find something creative and original. In Hollywood, if it makes money, keep making the same thing, no matter how watered down the product becomes. So when a blockbuster action movie comes along with a roughly 90% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, it makes me raise an eyebrow to be sure. And as it would turn out, Edge of Tomorrow was smart, funny, aesthetically pleasing, and an exciting breath of fresh air in this polluted cinematic summer.

The movie begins with shots from 24 hour news channels around the world reporting a growing invasion stemming from a meteor that crash landed in Germany. As you might expect, the aliens have quickly taken a liking to Earth and have nearly annihilated most of Europe. Tom Cruise’s character is a marketer, an advertiser, for the coalition of army forces, encouraging young men and women to join up and fight back this enemy. But when he suddenly has to black mail a superior, he winds up on the front lines of the biggest surge the army has planned. From there, well, he dies. He’s not a soldier, and he can barely handle dealing with his fellow troops, let alone a gun. But a funny thing happens when he dies: he wakes up, in the same place, and in the same circumstances as the day before. The day has reset. Shocked and confused, he is forced to live the same day over, and over, and over, as the plot thickens, Emily Blunt comes into play, and a master plan to finally destroy the entire alien race is realized. So, yes, it’s a far more original story that draws you in from the first few minutes and keeps the intrigue going until the credits being to roll.

One of the best parts of the film, and probably the most important that the creators of it had to protect against, was keeping it from becoming boring as we view the same day time and time again. That mission was accomplished pretty successfully, with the use of (surprisingly useful) humor, terrific action, and a story that grows into something pretty fun and extraordinary to watch. And, I think it’s pretty fair to say (for me at least) that Tom Cruise comes out sort of…unlikeable, to put it nicely, in the first fourth or so of the film. Not the character really, but Cruise himself. But as the movie went on, he became less obnoxious, and more likable and funny. Plus, the guy is over 50 and still doing some of his own stunts. Impressive stuff. Toss in a talented supporting actress in Blunt, good special effects, and an ending you’ll be discussing and arguing over, and you’ve got one heck of a summer action ride.

 

EDGE OF TOMORROW:original_barnstar original_barnstar original_barnstar (out of 4)

 

Review: 22 Jump Street

Hill and Tatum, once again, prove to be an incredible comedic duo. (Columbia Pictures/aceshowbiz.com)

Hill and Tatum, once again, prove to be an incredible comedic duo. (Columbia Pictures/aceshowbiz.com)

There have been very few comedies, or movies in general, that have surprised me in such a good way like 21 Jump Street did a few years back. It was such a perfect buddy comedy, and I never expected it to be so damn funny. So with a sequel coming out (the original made money, so this is a given), I was cautiously optimistic at the start. Then the trailers came out, and the really good reviews, and my hopes continued to go up, up, up. And after finally viewing the much anticipated return to Jump Street, I can safely say that this is not a disappointing second installment whatsoever. While I won’t say it’s superior to its predecessor, the bromance is as strong as ever, the jokes as frequent and funny, and an immense amount of fun.

The story picks up with Jump Street, now situated in sweet new digs (at a church with Vietnamese Jesus, not Korean Jesus) in another abandoned church, with Jonah Hill and Channing Tatum tracking a new case. When the first ten minutes of your movie have Jonah Hill doing some sort of Puerto Rican imitation, Tatum doing an even worse/hilarious one, and an octopus spraying into Hill’s mouth, you know you’re in for a good ride. Eventually, our two heroes get assigned a case incredibly similar to the one from their high school days in the first movie, but this time…in college. The directors take multiple jabs at themselves for making something exactly the same the way as the original, which is refreshing to see and hear from Hollywood – where studios act like films such as Transformers 2 are still incredibly unique.

But the absolute best and most prominent feature of the movie is the duo of Hill and Tatum. Somehow, someway, the chemistry between the chubby kid from Knocked Up and the star of Magic Mike is just perfection. The two play off of each other so well throughout the entire movie, and there are so many subtle or ‘throwaway’ jokes that heighten the film to new levels of hilarity. And really, how is Channing Tatum so funny? Not sure I understand how that happened. Regardless, I don’t know if there’s going to be a third Jump Street, but if there is, you can count me in. Because while 22 wasn’t quite as good as 21, it’s still better than almost any comedy I’ve seen recently.

 

22 JUMP STREET: original_barnstar original_barnstar original_barnstar (out of 4)

Review: Neighbors

Efron and Rogen bring together some funny co-stars in this enjoyably raunchy comedy. (Universal Pictures/aceshowbiz.com)

Efron and Rogen bring together some funny co-stars in this enjoyably raunchy comedy. (Universal Pictures/aceshowbiz.com)

It has Seth Rogen, Rose Byrne (from Bridesmaids fame), and Dave Franco. It’s got dildo fights, weed parties, and pube jokes. It has writers that worked on 40-Year-Old Virgin. In other words, how could this movie ever fail me? How could it miss? But despite all of that, and despite some seriously good scenes throughout, Neighbors never completely came together as a home-run comedy. While it had more than its fair share of moments, I would never call it ‘great’, and overall, isn’t up to par with any modern-day comedy classics either.

From the never-ending marketing blitz that’s taken place the past couple of months, I’m sure just about everyone knows the premise by now. Frat boys versus family. Let me focus on the family first of all, and that of course includes Seth Rogen. Pudgy, weed-loving, immature adult is who he plays – in other words, pretty much the same character as every film he’s ever been a part of. But with that said, he still manages to make it funny for the most part, and that’s impressive. Rose Byrne, who was surprisingly funny in the breakout comedy Bridesmaids, certainly held her own too. The chemistry between the two, even in the very sparse serious moments, was pretty decent for a stoner/frat comedy. I’ll take it.

Over to the frat…I knew Dave Franco would be solid, and he was, but it was the supporting characters that brought the most humor. Mintz-Plasse, aka ‘McLovin’ was good, Jerrod Carmichael and his memorable Garfield scene was great, and Craig Roberts who played ‘Ass Juice’ was good as well. Zac Efron, who accounted for 90% of the female ticket sales to this movie, was decent. I can’t remember anything hysterical generated from him alone, but he played off of Rogen pretty well (watch for the Batman scenes).

Did the movie drag a bit a times, especially as it got towards the end? Sure it did. And were the truly laugh-out-loud scenes spread just too apart to make it a next-level comedy? Absolutely. But I never truly expected this to be fantastic. I never though it would be elite, despite the early outstanding reviews from Rotten Tomatoes. So while it fell short of greatness, it was funny, it was enjoyable, and it’s worth seeing.

 

NEIGHBORS: original_barnstar  original_barnstar original_barnstar  (out of 4)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.